Former Foreign Secretary Gokhale said that India’s misunderstanding hurt China’s relations

Mismatched expectations and “misunderstandings”, particularly India’s concerns over the Belt and Road Initiative and China’s attitudes about Indo-US relations, lie at the root of deteriorating relations between Delhi and Beijing, and “anti-rivalry” and Can even lead to the future. Confrontation, former foreign secretary Vijay Gokhale called a new paper.

Also read: India, China should create ‘enabling situation’ to settle border dispute, Wang Yi said

Underscoring the continuing deterioration of relations, especially since 2013, when Chinese President Xi Jinping was elected President and in 2014, when Prime Minister Narendra Modi came to power, Mr Gokhale suggested that both sides should be There is a need to construct a more realistic assessment first. “Dealing with personal issues of concern”, such as border or trade.

“Both countries see themselves as the forces of civilization and expect others to accept this fact. Misunderstandings often convey the intentions of one country to another’s actions or behaviors that were probably not intended to be the latter, thus causing mistrust. Therefore, going forward, both parties may need to re-form their basic perceptions of the other side and reach a new perspective to deal with personal issues of concern. Relations’, published by Carnegie India.

It is the first such detailed account of bilateral relations since the former Foreign Secretary (2018-2020) and former Ambassador to China (2016-2017), who was a key negotiator during the Doklam standoff in 2017 last year.

Mr. Gokhale writes that the China Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) was seen as lacking sensitivity to India’s regional concerns in Jammu and Kashmir in New Delhi and its primacy in South Asia.

Also Read: Editorial | Dangerous deadlock: on the India-China border

“There have been no consultations between China and India regarding the BRI,” says Mr. Gokhale, presumably because the Chinese agreed that India would align its plans with the BRI and document it. When China declared the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) a major project, it became difficult for India to connect with the BRI. “

However, he said China attributes New Delhi’s disapproval of the BRI and its close ties to America’s “right-wing or Hindu nationalist pressure”.

“Beijing feels that the Modi government is more assertive, less sensitive to China’s main concerns, and more likely to side with China’s rivals.” It does not believe in its policies or actions because the Indian side has considered China a strategic threat. He then quoted several Chinese scholars and publications as saying that “China’s leaders felt that they had done nothing harmful to India’s interests, India was responding in ways that could be harmful to them.” Huh.”

Meanwhile, India’s membership of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad), which is scheduled to hold its first summit on Friday with US President Biden, Japanese Premier Suga, Australian Premier Morrison and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, is interpreted in Beijing. Is “part of the Indo-American control initiative”.

“From India’s point of view, China’s push into the Doklam plateau … appeared to raise questions on the basis of Rajiv Gandhi-Deng Xiaoping’s concurrence on the peaceful settlement of disputes,” he writes, stating the 2017 deadlock “matters to a head keeps”.

Mr. Gokhale says that a “decline” in India-China relations could be seen by the assassination of soldiers in Galvan in 2020, a decline that has been going on for a long time. He has been pledging since 2013 the Chinese invasion of the LAC, blocking UN listings for Pakistan-based terrorists, protesting India’s membership of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (2016), failure to address the trade deficit with India and bringing Lists to fail. 20 billion dollar investment in India, as factors.

The paper concludes that currently there may be a “last chance” for cooperation between the two countries after the dissolution of the LAC.

Gokhale writes, “If not, a new phase of antagonistic rivalry may begin, as confrontation with countries within the strategic periphery of China is possible.”